Builders and backers
For teams shipping a clinical product and the investors funding them, who need to know the evidence is real before launch or capital goes in.
Wearables · Sensors · Software as a Medical Device
Your numbers are going to be tested.Better it happens here.
A product can be accurate, validated, cleared, and still tell a clinician the wrong thing.
Metriqx is run by a clinician scientist. We assess health technology the way the person at the end of it has to: not whether the number is accurate, but whether it means what the label says, and whether someone can safely act on it in the setting where it actually arrives.
Illustrative. Heart rate variability from a wrist wearable, against rising task complexity.
What we do
Build. Assess. Assure.
BuildWhat to build, and what to measure
- Human-State Measurement Strategy
- Validation Study Design
- Study Delivery, End to End
- Clinical Product Advisory
- Named Clinical Safety Officer
- Evidence Review, Essential
- Evidence Review, Standard
- Evidence Review, Full
- Anticipated Use Assessment
- Formative Usability Evaluation
- Deployment Assurance
- Cognitive Load Mapping
Free
Self-assessment toolkit
Check your own claims against the framework before you talk to anyone. Twelve questions, scored in your browser: nothing is sent anywhere. It ends by naming the offering that fits your weakest layer, including when the answer is none of them.
Open the toolkitWho it is for
Two domains, one framework.
Teams and vendors
For teams in elite sport, defence, and other high-performance settings relying on a number to drive a decision, and the vendors selling it, who need to know the number means what the dashboard says.
Building, buying, or backing it?
Evidence review and technical advisory for the teams building it, and an independent read for the people committing money.