What to build, and what to measure

Strategy memo

The measurement stack, decision tree and risk notes, as a written report.

Detailed measurement plan

The memo, plus fuller measurement planning around it.

Which measures to use, before there is a claim to test them against.

A recommended measurement stack for your stated product or study goal: physiological and subjective measures paired against the use case, a decision tree for when each applies, and named risks and limitations per measure.

For companies who have not built the product yet, or whose claim is not fixed, deciding what to measure and how before there is anything to validate.

This chooses the measures. Evidence Review tests whether measures you already chose support the claim you are making.

Review

A written critique of the endpoint, reference standard, annotation methodology, population and analysis plan of a protocol you already hold, with required changes specified and prioritised.

Design

A full protocol built from your claim: claim-to-endpoint mapping, reference standard construction, annotation methodology, population, sample size justification and statistical analysis plan, delivered as a document a site can execute against and an ethics committee can review, with a site selection note.

A protocol written from your claim, not from a template. Or a critical review of the one you have.

For companies with a protocol in hand who need it stress tested before it goes to a site or an ethics committee, or with a study concept who need it built properly the first time.

The review criticises what exists. The design creates what does not. If you hold a written protocol with an analysis plan, an annotation manual and a sample size justification, you need the review. If you hold a study concept, you need the design.

Metriqx can run the validation study, not just design it.

Chief Investigator responsibility for the whole study: ethics governance, data collection and analysis, through to the final validation report, as one accountable engagement rather than a set of separate commissions.

For companies who want Metriqx to hold full delivery responsibility for a validation study, not just design it.

Validation Study Design hands you a protocol to run yourself. This runs it: Metriqx carries delivery risk for the whole study, not just its design.

Clinical use-case definition

A document setting out the clinical problem, the intended user, the decision the output informs, and the endpoint that would demonstrate it.

Retainer

Ongoing claim architecture, endpoint selection, clinical review of design decisions before they are built in, and a named clinical presence for investor and NHS conversations.

The clinical use case, defined before the product fixes what it can ever claim.

For teams making product decisions that will determine their evidence ceiling, typically before or alongside a study.

Assessment tells a company what it got wrong. Advisory stops it happening.